MANAGEMENT OF SACROCOCCYGEAL PILONIDAL SINUS WITH LIMBERG FLAP - RESULTS OF 55 PATIENTS

  • Ana Marta António Interno da Formação Específica em Dermatovenereologia/Resident Dermatology and Venereology, Serviço de Dermatovenereologia, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
  • João Alves Interno da Formação Específica em Dermatovenereologia/Resident Dermatology and Venereology, Serviço de Dermatovenereologia, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
  • João Goulão Assistente Hospitalar de Dermatovenereologia/Consultant Dermatology and Venereology, Serviço de Dermatovenereologia, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal; Assistente Hospitalar de Dermatovenereologia/Consultant Dermatology and Venereology, Hospital da Luz, Portugal
Keywords: Pilonidal Sinus/surgery, Surgical Flaps

Abstract

Introduction: The treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is a surgical challenge and no gold standard therapy is defined. Excision and reconstruction with Limberg flap is an excellent choice as an alternative to classical methods with faster recovery and fewer complications and recurrence.

Material and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus treated with Limberg flap between 2007 and 2014 in two tertiary-care centers. We analyzed demographic data, surgical procedure, complications, recovery time and recurrence.

Results: 55 patients were treated during this period, with a median age of 28 years and male preponderance (82%). Forty-eight patients (87%) were treated with classical Limberg flap and the others (13%) with modified/ lateralized Limberg flap. The final suture was removed on average after 14 days and patients were able to return to work after 15 days. Surgical site infection occurred in 4 patients and recurrence occurred also in 4 patients. The frequency of immediate complications was superior in patients treated with lateralized Limberg flap and occurred in 57% of these patients. The recurrences occurred only in patients treated with classical Limberg flap on average 2.5 years after surgery.

Conclusions: The Limberg flap technique has advantages over excision with primary closure or marsupialization, with better complications and recurrence profile. In contrast with published literature, we found more complications in patients treated with modified Limberg flap. Due to its advantages, Limberg flap technique plays an important role in the treatment of pilonidal disease, in a young working population.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S, Haboubi N. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol. 2003; 7:3-8.

Bascom J. Pilonidal sinus: origin from follicles of hairs and results of follicle removal as treatment. Surgery.

; 87: 567-72.

Miyata T, Toh H, Doi F, Torisu M. Pilonidal sinus on the neck. Surg Today. 1992; 22:379-82.

Brearly R. Pilonidal sinus: a new theory of origin. Br J Surg. 1955; 43:62-8.

Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet. 1973; 2:1414-15.

Mentes BB, Leventoglu S, Cihan A, Tatlicioglu E, Akin M, Oguz M. Modified Limberg transposition flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Surg Today. 2004; 34: 419-23.

Topgul K, Ozdemir E, Kilic K, Gokbayir H, Ferahkose Z. Long-term results of Limberg flap procedure for treatment

of pilonidal sinus: a report of 200 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46:1545-8.

Eposito F, Lauro M, Tirone LP, Festa RM, Peluso G, Mazzoni G, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma and pilonidal cyst

disease. Ann Ital Chir. 2015; 20: 86.

Akca T, Colak T, Ustunsoy B, Kanik A, Aydin S. Randomized clinical trial comparing primary closure with de

Limberg flap in the treatment of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Br J Surg. 2005; 92:1081-4.

Mahdy T. Surgical treatment of the pilonidal disease: primary closure or flap reconstruction after excision. Dis

Colon Rectum. 2008; 51:1816-22.

Ertan T, Koc M, Gocmen E, Aslar AK, Keskek M, Kilic M. Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus

surgery? Am J Surg. 2005; 190:388-92.

Sondenaa K, Nesvik I, Andersen E, Soreide JA. Recurrent pilonidal sinus after excision with closed or open treatment: final result of a randomised trial. Eur J Surg. 1996;162:237-40.

Topgul K. Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with rhomboid flap. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.

; 24:7-12.

Tokac M, Dumlu EG, Aydin MS, Yalcin A, Kilic M. Comparison of modified limberg flap and karydakis flap operations in pilonidal sinus surgery: prospective randomized study. 2015; 100:870-7.

Duman K, Ozdemir Y, Yucel E, Akin ML. Comparison of depression, anxiety and long-term quality of health in

patients with a history of either primary closure or Limberg flap reconstruction for pilonidal sinus. Clinics (Sao

Paulo). 2014; 69:384-7.

Bali Í, Aziret M, Sözen S, Emir S, Erdem H, Cetinkünar S, et al. Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in

recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015; 70:350-5.

Kaya B, Eris C, Atalay S, Bat O, Bulut NE, Mantoglu B, et al. Modified Limberg transposition flap in the treatment

of pilonidal sinus disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16:55-9.

Sit M, Aktas G, Yilmaz EE. Comparison of the three surgical flap techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery. Am Surg.

; 79:1263-8.

Goulão J, Furtado C. Sinus pilonidalis sacrococcígeo – tratamento cirúrgico com retalho rombóide de Limberg.

Rev. Soc Port Dermato Venereol. 2009; 67:107-12.

Mentes O, Bagci M, Bilgin T, Ozgul O, Ozdemir M. Management of pilonidal sinus disease with oblique excision

and primary closure: results of 493 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006; 49:104-8.

Huyuron B, Dinner MI, Dowden RV. Excision and grafting in treatment of recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. Surg

Gynecol Obstet. 1983; 156:201-4.

McLaren CA. Partial closure and other techniques in pilonidal surgery: an assessment of 157 cases. Br J

Surg.1984; 71:561-2.

Chavez C, Raffo A, Larenas P. Quisto sacrococcigeo: un tratamiento quirurgico definitivo y sus fundamentos fisiopatologicos. Cader Chil Cirug. 1988; 32:285-8.

Hodgson WJ, Greenstein RJ. A comparative study between Z-plasty and incision and drainage or excision

with marsupialization for pilonidal sinuses. Sure Gynecol Obstet. 1981; 153: 842-4.

Unalp HR, Derici H, Kamer E, Nazli O, Onal MA. Lower recurrence rate for Limberg vs V-Y Flap for Pilonidal

Sinus. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50: 1436-44.

Keshava A, Young CJ, Ruckard MJ, Sinclair G. Karydakis flap repair for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease:

how important is technique? ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:181-3.

Peterson S, Wietelmann K, Evers T, Huser N, Matevossian E, Doll D. Long-term effects of postoperative razor epilation in pilonidal sinus disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:131-4.

Badawy EA, Kanawati MN. Effect of hair removal by Nd:Yag laser on the recurrence of pilonidal sinus. J Eur

Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009; 23:883-6.

Demircan F, Akbulut S, Yavuz R, Agtas H, Karabulut K, Yagmur Y. The effect of laser epilation on recurrence and

satisfaction in patients with sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Int J

Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8: 2929-33.

Published
2016-01-28
How to Cite
António, A. M., Alves, J., & Goulão, J. (2016). MANAGEMENT OF SACROCOCCYGEAL PILONIDAL SINUS WITH LIMBERG FLAP - RESULTS OF 55 PATIENTS. Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology, 73(4), 459-464. https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.73.4.487
Section
Surgical Dermatology

Most read articles by the same author(s)